Monthly Archives: June 2012

YB Teresa Kok to officiate ground breaking ceremony at Taman Putra Prima 8A on 30/6/2012

This function opens to all Taman Putra Prima and Taman Mas Residents and the following lunch catering menu will be served.

1)      Nasi Briyani
2)      Ayam Masak Merah
3)      Daging Masak Kurma
4)      Dalca Sayur
5)      Pappadom
6)      2 types of kuih
7)      Dessert: sliced watermelon, honey dew and oranges
8)      Drink: iced cordial drink

時刻檢討改善指南‧雪州沒凍結圍籬社區計劃

(雪蘭莪‧八打靈再也2日訊)掌管雪州地方政府、研究及考察事務的行政議員劉天球重申,在“盜賊橫行”與治安欠佳的環境裡,雪州政府沒有凍結州內的守衛與圍籬社區計劃的理由。

雪州政府仍堅持必須獲得85%或以上的居民同意,就可在少數服從多數的情況下在花園住宅區落實保安圍欄計劃。

他說,州政府沒有發出“凍結”守衛與圍籬社區計劃的指示,相信是部份地方政府傳達或溝通問題,才會接收錯誤的訊息。

星洲日报报导

What if our PP8A guard house without Building Plan Approval from MPSepang ?

Please see today news in Puchong Hartamas

(蒲種22日訊)蒲種金地第一期花園保安亭日前突遭梳邦再也市議會拆除掉,引起居民怒吼,紛譴責市議會蠻橫行為!

郭素沁:多數保安亭沒申請

郭素沁說,雪州多數花園保安亭皆不合法,在沒獲得市議會建築批准和土地局發出臨時住用證下,違例興建。

中国报报导
南洋商报报导
星洲日报报导 1
星洲日报报导 2
Puchong Hartamas with YB Teresa Kok

YB Teresa explaining to angry residents with MPSJ officers

Puchong Hartamas illegal Guard House was demolished by MPSJ on 20/6/2012

A guest came to my yard at Taman Putra Prima 8A on this fine Sunday morning, attracted by my red ixora: the native Olive Backed Sunbird

Taman Putra Prima 8A guard house building plan had been approved by Majlis Perbandaran Sepang on 13/6/2012

Project7

SIDE3

The fundamental setup and running of our gated and guarded community

For those new owners who are not the first hand buyer, or subsales buyers or even tenants. We welcome you to be part of our community. As you may not have any prior knowledge on the formation of our RA, neither nor you involved in our referendum process, the facts and figures below may help you understand better the fundamental setup and running of our gated and guarded community.

100% or all the 197 unit owners had signed the application for the erection of perimeter fencing and guard house to the YDP Majlis Perbandaran Sepang. And more than 80% had voted in favour of the referendum for the contribution of setup cost RM300.00 (paid before 15/12/2011) or RM450.00(paid after 15/12/2011) and RM50.00 monthly maintenance fees. (starting from 15/12/2011) To date over 90% had paid for their fair share.

Please be noted that every unit had pre-paid to the developer RM480.00 for the first 6 months maintenance fees @ RM80.00/month when the unit keys were handed over to purchasers from 11/4/2011 and the cut-off point  given by the developer was 24/10/2011 and upon request from the RA, developer extended the security service till 15/12/2011 before it was taken over by the RA. In another word the security service was maintained or paid by the RA thereafter ( from15/12/2011 onwards).

Once again we appeal to less than 10% of the unit owners, please be considerate as this is not fair to over 90% majority  who had helped to make your gated and guarded property in place and enable you to fetch a much higher selling price as compare to those poorly managed or without G & G community property investment.

Moreover the voluntary RA committee was also working extremely hard to get all these setting up in more proper order from scratch, The RA committee is not a professional real estate agent or property manager, they are just an ordinary unit owner from our Taman, the only difference is they care about the welfare and the security of the community and willing to sacrifice part of their leisure time or even out of their office working hour to do all these on voluntary basis. I think all the residents owe them a big favour. Let’s do our part to make this Taman a better place to live instead of making it difficult for people working so hard for your benefit. The RA committee members and Chairman did not pay a single cent less than anyone of you, neither receive any remuneration, and yet they worked for all relentlessly and always being criticised unfairly even on matters not within their jurisdiction, ability or control.

The RA is not Telekom, Celcom or Astro, it is unreasonable to make such a comparison, the RA just simply does’t have the manpower and resources to print out and to send a statement or reminder to every single unit every month, we just put important notice on the bill board above the access card reader. I think 1½ month grace period is reasonable or more than sufficient to notify anyone to contribute his fair share.

Just ask yourself a simple question, what have you done for the good of the community, and how much have  you benefited from the higher property value and more secured protected living environment from someone else sacrifice or contribution?

We would like to share with you a famous quote from John F Kennedy (formal US President):

Ask what you can do for your community (country), Ask not what your community(country) can do for you.

http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/7/28/business/11736531&sec=business

Please read more from PDF link below

徵收保安亭建设费和维持费

COLLECTION OF GUARDHOUSE SETUP COST AND MAINTENANCE FEES

Tenant Code of Conduct

Recently there are talks about the unwelcome behavior of some of the TPP8A tenants. To certain extent, they have caused some uneasy among the residents of TPP8A. The phenomena incluces:
1. Bring a group of outsider and making noise in their house until late night.
2. Drinking beer beside the street and making noise until late night.
3. Breaking beer bottle on the street while drinking in the midnight.
4. Drive recklessly and ran over neighbor’s flower bed.

In order to maintain a harmony living environment in TPP8A, commitment and cooperation from owners and their tenants are needed.

Owners at TPP8A should understand that their tenants are their representatives. Their behavior is a direct reflection on the surrounding residents and affects their daily life and activities. Tenants of TPP8A must at all times behave in a professional manner and respect neighbors, the community and the property in which they reside. As a tenant of TPP8A, they shall aware that they are part of the local community and must acknowledge the inherent rights of their neighbors. Thus, certain standards of conduct must exist and be enforced.

圍籬產業與守衛產業的认识

“圍籬”(Gated)與“守衛”(Guarded)產業單位,兩者之間有哪些不同,相信有不少人還不是很清楚;近年來,市場的趨勢是興建“圍籬”與“守衛”產業單位,這些並不局限於共管或分層產業,也包括有地住宅單位。

另一個後市看起的趨勢:許多原有的有地房產,近數年來也安置流動保安亭、築起守衛杆,聘請了一些保安員,原因:社區治安太壞了!居民或業主被迫出錢、出力改善社區的治安。

看看現有花園住宅區都築起守衛杆,聘請保安員,在一些次要的出入口通道排滿汽油桶,發展商新推出的有圍籬與有守衛產業計劃,都賣得相當不錯

雖然這些是有地房產計劃,但由於是圍籬、共管性質,有關單位的地契歸為分層產業部門處理,受到1985年分層地契法令的約束,不像現有的有地排屋,儘管築起守衛杆、安置守衛室,這些依然是個別地契單位。

若要對這些單位有基本認識,比較容易區分,其中一個特點是:共管產業在還未有分層地契或個別地契期間,有成立聯合管理機構,至於個別地契單位的原有住宅區,只成立居民協會。

發展商新建的有地、有守衛住宅產業計劃,若已有地契,排除圍籬的特色,免去成立聯合管理機構的需要。

至於有守衛產業計劃,這些是獲得全面或局部守衛服務的住宅區,提供社區居民相關的保安服務。

圍籬產業背景 由管理機構管理

由發展商提供的圍籬與有守衛房產單位,是一些社區保安改善的例子,吸引不少潛在買家購買圍籬與有守衛的產業單位,除了多層的住宅產業計劃,業者也提供有地附設圍籬與有守衛特色的房產單位。

有關趨勢的進展,促使1985年分層地契法令於2007年加以修訂,在分層地契法令之下,已經有地契的房產單位,將由擁有共管產業的管理機構負責管理,籬笆圍繞整個住宅區。

所謂的“有地分層產業”,稱為“圍籬社區計劃”,除了圍籬社區計劃,在現有及新的住宅區,也設立有守衛社區。

在雪州的448個守衛社區,其中220個獲得地方政府當局的批准,另外228個是在沒有獲批准下運作。

住宅社區安置守衛室、守衛防杆、圍籬、限制公眾進入有關社區,有時难免會對出入有關地區的人造成不便。

鑒於圍籬社區及守衛社區迅速成長起來,催促了地方政府當局制定相關條例的必要,以控制及監管圍籬社區及守衛社區的發展。(星洲日報/投資致富‧地產札記)

Image

An ideal air field was cleared just in front of Phase 3B

Kong is preparing to take off his RC plane,

Flying high freely in the air…….cool and relaxing