Commissioning of LPR Security Barrier System

The Persatuan Penduduk Jalan Putra Prima 2 (8A) (“RA”) is pleased to announce that the License Plate Recognition (LPR) Security Barrier System has been fully installed, tested, and commissioned since August 2025.
During the commissioning period, the RA, together with appointed vendors and security personnel, has successfully resolved technical fine-tuning matters, including system calibration, data accuracy, and operational familiarisation. This phased approach was necessary to ensure system reliability, security integrity, and compliance before full implementation.


Effective Date
With immediate effect, the LPR system is officially adopted as part of the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) of our Majlis-approved Gated & Guarded (G&G) Community Scheme.


Access Control & Security SOP Clarification
For avoidance of doubt:
1. The LPR system is a security access control mechanism, not a punitive measure, and is implemented to safeguard residents, properties, and public safety within the Scheme.
2. Differentiated access procedures between registered members and non-registered users do not constitute discrimination or unequal treatment, but are standard security practices adopted by gated communities nationwide.
3. All property owners, tenants, residents, visitors, and service providers are subject to security screening and SOP compliance when accessing the Scheme.
4. The requirement for certain users to utilise guard-operated or visitor lanes, including identity verification where applicable, is solely for security management purposes and does not negate ownership, residency, or lawful occupation status.


Legal Position & Compliance
The RA wishes to clarify that:
• The implementation and enforcement of the access control SOPs are expressly permitted under Malaysian law, including the Federal Court ruling affirming the authority of Residents’ Associations to impose reasonable conditions on non-paying members within a gated community.
• Security SOPs are uniformly applied, based on membership status and system registration, and not on personal identity, family status, or individual preference.
• Ownership of property within the Scheme does not exempt any person from complying with approved security procedures, nor does it confer automatic access to restricted lanes or automated systems without proper registration and compliance.
• The RA acts strictly within its mandate as a ROS-registered, democratically elected residents’ association, operating a Majlis-approved G&G Scheme, and does not act arbitrarily, selectively, or in bad faith.


• Federal Court rules residents association can impose conditions on non-paying member


Cooperation & Community Harmony
The RA respectfully advises all residents to refrain from actions that may disrupt security operations, inconvenience other residents, or place security personnel in difficult positions, including attempts to bypass SOPs or exert undue pressure on guards or committee members.
Mutual cooperation ensures a smooth, safe, and pleasant experience for everyone in our community.
The RA appreciates the patience, understanding, and continued support of residents as we enhance the security, order, and quality of living in our most cherished Taman Putra Prima 8A Gated & Guarded Community Scheme, in full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.


Persatuan Penduduk Jalan Putra Prima 2 (8A)
Management Committee
Taman Putra Prima 8A, Puchong

常见问题解答(FAQ)

产业转让、保安/维护费欠款与出入管理蒲种 Putra Prima 8A(TPP8A)围篱与保安社区

纠纷通常发生在以下情况下:原业主在出售产业前停止缴付保安或维护费用,而新买家在完成交易前未向居民协会查询该单位状况

1. 为什么产业更换业主后常发生纠纷?

当新业主入住并申请门禁卡或自动闸门权限时,才发现该单位仍有未清欠费,从而引发误解。


2. 为什么保安与维护费是跟着单位,而不是跟着人

保安与维护服务属于以产业单位为基础(unit-based的公共服务,不论业主或住户是谁,服务始终提供给同一个单位。

当费用未缴付,代表社区已为该单位提供了服务。因此,欠费是附着在产业单位本身,而非个人


3. 为什么居民协会不追讨已搬走的前业主?

居民协会并非任何买卖或租赁合约的当事方

在产业完成转让后,居民协会与前业主不再存在管理关系,也无权介入或执行私人合约。相关责任应由买卖双方自行处理。


4. 这样对新业主是否不公平?

居民协会理解新业主的感受,但必须强调:产业交易的尽职调查责任属于买卖双方,并非社区责任。

因此,居民协会早已在社区入口处设立公告,提醒所有潜在买家及租户在作出任何承诺前,应主动向居民协会查询单位状况。


5. 居民协会是否强迫新业主代还前业主欠款?

不是

居民协会不会强迫任何人向特定对象付款。欠费如何处理,应由买卖双方在买卖合约(SPA)中自行解决

居民协会仅负责执行保安管理及既定标准作业程序(SOP)。


6. 为什么有时无法立即使用自动闸门或门禁卡?

这属于保安管理措施,并非惩罚。

在行政或登记事项未完成前,出入可能需经由保安操作或进行身份核实。出入权利未被剥夺,产业所有权亦不受影响。


7. 这样的做法是否合法?

是的

马来西亚法院已确认,居民协会有权在合理情况下,对未缴费单位实施合理的出入管理措施。这是全国围篱与保安社区的常见做法


8. 为什么居民协会不能直接注销欠费?

若每次产业转让就注销欠费,将导致守时缴费的居民承担他人欠款,并影响社区长期财务与保安运作

居民协会有责任维护全体居民的共同利益


9. 买家应如何避免此类问题?

建议潜在买家:

  1. 在签署合约前联系居民协会
  2. 查询单位的保安与维护费状况
  3. 在 SPA 中妥善处理相关事项
  4. 完成后进行出入系统登记

10. 居民协会的处理原则是什么?

居民协会秉持透明、公平、合法及一致执行的原则,确保围篱与保安社区的长期稳定与可持续发展


蒲种 Putra Prima 8A 居民协会
管理委员会

FAQ-Change of Ownership, Outstanding Security & Maintenance Fees And Access Control

Change of Ownership, Outstanding Security & Maintenance Fees, and Access Control
Taman Putra Prima 8A (TPP8A)
(Majlis-Approved Gated & Guarded Community Scheme)
________________________________________

1. Why do disputes often arise after a change of property ownership?
Disputes typically arise when a previous owner ceases payment of security or maintenance fees prior to selling the property, and the new purchaser completes the transaction without verifying the unit’s status with the Residents’ Association (RA).

When the new owner subsequently applies for access cards or automated barrier access, outstanding charges attached to the unit may be discovered, leading to misunderstanding.
________________________________________

2. Why are security and maintenance charges tied to the property (unit) and not the individual?

Security and maintenance services are unit-based services, continuously provided to the same property regardless of ownership or occupancy.

These include guarding services, access control systems, CCTV, perimeter security, and internal infrastructure. Where charges remain unpaid, services have already been rendered to the unit. Accordingly, outstanding charges are attached to the unit, not the person.
________________________________________

3. Why does the Residents’ Association not pursue the previous owner?

The Residents’ Association is not a party to any private Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA) or tenancy agreement.
Once a property has been sold and the previous owner has vacated the Scheme, the RA has no contractual relationship with that party and no authority to enforce private agreements. Recovery of such matters is strictly between buyer and seller.
________________________________________

4. Is this unfair to the new owner?

The RA acknowledges the concern. However, due diligence in property transactions rests with the buyer and seller, not the community.
To ensure transparency, a clear notice has long been displayed at the Scheme entrance, advising all prospective purchasers and tenants to verify the unit’s security and maintenance status with the RA prior to making any commitment.
________________________________________

5. Does the RA force new owners to pay the previous owner’s debt?
No.
The RA does not compel payment to any party. How outstanding charges are addressed is a private contractual matter to be resolved between buyer and seller, typically within the SPA.
The RA’s role is limited to administering security services and enforcing approved SOPs consistently for the benefit of the community.
________________________________________
6. Why is access card or automated barrier access sometimes restricted?

Restricted or manual access is a security management measure, not a penalty.
Where administrative or registration issues remain unresolved, access may be routed through guard-assisted lanes with identity verification. Access is not denied, and ownership rights are not affected.
________________________________________

7. Is this practice lawful?
Yes.
Malaysian courts have affirmed that Residents’ Associations may impose reasonable access conditions on non-paying members within gated and guarded communities. Such practices are lawful, common nationwide, and necessary for fairness and security.
________________________________________

8. Why can’t the RA simply write off outstanding charges?

Writing off outstanding charges upon every ownership change would unfairly burden paying residents and undermine the financial sustainability of the Scheme.
The RA has a fiduciary duty to act in the collective interest of all residents, not to absorb losses arising from private transactions.
________________________________________

9. How can purchasers avoid this issue?

Prospective purchasers are strongly advised to:
1. Contact the RA before signing any agreement
2. Verify the unit’s security and maintenance status
3. Address any outstanding matters in the SPA
4. Complete access registration upon completion
This prevents almost all disputes.
________________________________________

10. What is the RA’s guiding principle?

The RA operates on transparency, consistency, legality, and fairness to all residents, while ensuring the long-term sustainability of the Gated & Guarded Community Scheme.
________________________________________

Persatuan Penduduk Jalan Putra Prima 2 (8A)
Management Committee

Transition to Cashless Payments for TPP8A Residents

To All PP8A Owners & Residents

According to recent Visa study, more than two-thirds of Malaysian consumers have attempted to adopt a cashless lifestyle. In the Consumer Payment Attitudes (CPA) study, the shift towards cashless payments was primarily driven by Gen Z and Gen Y, with nearly four in five respondents successfully adopting a cashless lifestyle.

Seven out of 10 Malaysian consumers have attempted to go cashless, with Gen Z and Gen Y leading the way at 85 per cent and 78 per cent, respectively.

In line with the current trend, our RA is also moving toward cashless and paperless maintenance fees collection, moreover as Ramli is going to retire soon, cash collection is very unsecured if were to be handled or collected by foreigner guards.

Thus we ardently urge all residents to pay maintenance fee by the following options

1) Online banking transfer

Hong Leong Bank  A/C  270-000-31900     Persatuan Penduduk JPP2

2)  DuitNow QR

Hong Leong Bank  PERSATUAN PENDUDUK JPP2

Please screen shot your payment slip, state clearly the unit address and the owner’s name and send via whatsApp to our Treasurer for record (017-6255248).

Thank you.

2024 G&G Permit Renewed

Renewal of Majlis Approved Gated & Guarded Community Scheme For Taman Putra Prima Fasa 8A (JPP2)

Surat Kelulusan Skim Dari Jabatan Perancangan Bandar MPSepang

“没给管理费者就自己操作拦车杆 “上诉庭三司宣判居民协会胜诉

https://www.kwongwah.com.my/20230417/mbpj%E8%BE%96%E5%8C%BA%E5%B1%85%E6%B0%91%E6%8B%92%E4%BB%98%E6%AF%8F%E6%9C%88%E7%BB%B4%E6%8A%A4%E8%B4%B9%EF%BC%9F-%E4%B8%8A%E8%AF%89%E5%BA%AD%EF%BC%9A%E8%87%AA%E5%B7%B1%E6%8B%89%E6%A0%8F%E6%9D%86/

上诉庭今日宣判,居民协会可以规定没有付管理费的业主和居民,必须自行操作拦车杆。

《马新社》报道,上诉庭三司是推翻高庭裁决,批准八打灵再也市Parkville居民协会主席周浩满(Chow Hau Mun,译音)的上诉。

周浩满之前向八打灵再也市议会争取,规定居住在Parkville但没付管理费的业主和居民,或非居民协会成员,必须自行操作拦车杆,不得要求保安员帮忙。

Appeals Court allows RA to impose condition to non-paying members to operate boom gate themselves

https://www.sinardaily.my/article/194155/malaysia/national/appeals-court-allows-ra-to-impose-condition-on-non-paying-members-to-operate-boom-gates-themselves

PUTRAJAYA: A registered residents’ association within the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) can impose conditions on members who do not contribute towards security and maintenance, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

A three-member bench chaired by Justice Has Zanah Mehat said a condition set by the Parkville residents’ association requiring non-paying members to operate the boom gates themselves is reasonable.

Has Zanah said the decision was in line with a 2015 Federal Court ruling in the case of Au Kean Hoe v Persatuan Penduduk D’Villa Equestrian.

In that case, the apex court ruled that the construction of a guardhouse and boom gates did not amount to an “obstruction” under Section 46(1)(a) of the Street, Drainage and Building Act 1974.

Section 46(1)(a) makes it an offence for any person to erect an obstruction in any public place.

“There has to be a balance between the interests of the community as a whole and the individuals (non-paying residents),” said Has Zanah when allowing the appeal by Parkville residents’ association president Chow Hau Mun.

Has Zanah, who sat with Justices Che Ruzima Ghazali and See Mee Chun, said it would be unreasonable for non-paying residents to enjoy the benefits of a security system without having to contribute towards it.

The oral decision was delivered online after the bench heard submissions by parties.

Lawyers Malik Imtiaz Sarwar and A Surendra Ananth represented Chow, while Yatiswara Ramachandran appeared for MBPJ.

Chow was appealing the decision of the Shah Alam High Court last year dismissing his judicial review application.

Justice Shahnaz Sulaiman had held that the residents’ association could not impose such conditions on those who refuse to pay the monthly service fees.

She said MBPJ’s gated community guidelines do not allow associations to discriminate against non-paying residents and non-members.

Chow had filed for the judicial review after MBPJ in 2021 rejected the association’s application for permission to make non-paying members and non-members operate the boom gates themselves.

Dismissing the application, the judge ruled that MBPJ could prohibit any association under its authority from imposing unreasonable conditions on homeowners.

She said MBPJ’s decision not to allow the association to impose the rule was not illegal, irrational or unreasonable.

Another Flood Mitigation Works Proposed by PP8A Resident Association in Taman Putra Prima had been put in place.

4/10/2021

Following numerous complaints of flooding by Taman Putra Prima and Taman Mas residents, TPP8A RA brought the matter with a proposal to meet the Pengarah Kejuruteraan MPSepang En Ahmad Saifunazif in a townhall meeting held on 9/11/2018. We proposed to have an alternative water channel serves to drain off excessive water from the existing water retention basin. We were grateful that our proposal was indeed well received by the Majlis .

Subsequently construction work commenced on 7/9/2020 and is now completed. Hopefully with this new alternative water channel in place, there won’t be any more flash flood incident at the western end junction of Jalan Putra Prima Utara in the future.

Nevertheless, We would like to take this opportunity to express our most heartfelt thank and appreciation to the ADUN of Dengkil, YB Tuan Adhif, Ahli Majlis En Syamsol, Ahli Majlis En Mohd Nazri Sohot and MPSepang for taken our flood mitigation proposal and implemented it soon after.

Terima Kasih kepada semua pihak yang telah membantu kami, hakikatnya cadangan sudah jadi realiti.

G&G License for Year 2020 has been renewed

20/7/2020